WEATHER ALERT
Appellate judges question moves to keep Alina Habba in place as top New Jersey prosecutor
Read full article: Appellate judges question moves to keep Alina Habba in place as top New Jersey prosecutorFederal appeals court judges questioned the Trump administration’s maneuvers to keep the president’s former lawyer, Alina Habba, in place as New Jersey’s top federal prosecutor.
Judge says former Trump lawyer Alina Habba has been unlawfully serving as US attorney in New Jersey
Read full article: Judge says former Trump lawyer Alina Habba has been unlawfully serving as US attorney in New JerseyA judge has ruled that President Donald Trump’s former lawyer, Alina Habba, has been unlawfully serving as the the top federal prosecutor in New Jersey.
:strip_exif(true):strip_icc(true):no_upscale(true):quality(65)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gmg/HFSCV3Z2RVFKJFPPGQ6NUQGKSU.jpg)
Trump's legal team cried vote fraud, but courts found none
Read full article: Trump's legal team cried vote fraud, but courts found noneBut it has proved a disaster in court, where judges uniformly rejected their claims of vote fraud and found the campaign's legal work amateurish. No judges ever found any evidence of election fraud in Pennsylvania or any other state where the campaign sued — not in Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada or Georgia. Judges in Michigan and Arizona, finding no evidence of fraud, refused to block the certification of county vote tallies. “I don’t really pay attention to the chatter until I see a legal brief.”___On Tuesday, Giuliani stepped into the courtroom. “The best description of this situation is widespread, nationwide voter fraud,” Giuliani argued.
:strip_exif(true):strip_icc(true):no_upscale(true):quality(65)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gmg/JY5XLT7UEFEFPKUKSZSRREFZMY.jpg)
In blistering ruling, judge throws out Trump suit in Pennsylvania
Read full article: In blistering ruling, judge throws out Trump suit in Pennsylvania(AP Photo/Mark Scolforo)A federal judge issued a scathing order Saturday dismissing the Trump campaign’s futile effort to block the certification of votes in Pennsylvania, shooting down claims of widespread irregularities with mail-in ballots. U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Brann wrote in his order that Trump had asked the court to disenfranchise almost 7 million voters. “That has not happened.”Even if he'd won the Pennsylvania case, Trump would have needed to win other lawsuits in other states where he'd also asked to delay certification. Brann ruled that Pennsylvania officials can certify election results that currently show Biden winning the state by more than 80,000 votes. Opposing lawyer Mark Aronchick suggested Giuliani must not know the Pennsylvania election code.
:strip_exif(true):strip_icc(true):no_upscale(true):quality(65)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gmg/2H73I4TSZZE7DDOOYASMJUSIKA.jpg)
In court, Giuliani argues to block Biden win in Pennsylvania
Read full article: In court, Giuliani argues to block Biden win in PennsylvaniaThe court case is over the Trump campaign's federal lawsuit seeking to prevent the battleground state of Pennsylvania from certifying its election. Giuliani responded, “the scope of the remedy is because of the scope of the injury." But Giuliani, the former New York City mayor, spent most of his time in court claiming baselessly that a wide-ranging scheme in Pennsylvania and elsewhere stole the election from Trump in battleground states won by Biden. This is not an isolated case, this is a case that is repeated in at least 10 other jurisdictions,” Giuliani said, without citing any evidence. Trump's campaign has not been shy in previous weeks about publicizing what they say is evidence of election fraud.